Wind Systems Magazine

May 21, 2013

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Best Practices for Turbine Manufacturers

The experts at Rockwell Automation have developed six...

 

Links in the Wind Supply Chain

Are you looking for someone to simply supply component...

 

LOGISTICS

Logistics planning requires factoring in the interaction...

 

Favorable Winds in Missouri

Steady winds, a healthy business infrastructure, and an...

 

TECHNOLOGY

Optimizing passive tuned mass dampers can greatly reduce...

 

A Virtual Toolbox of Technologies

The BEAST tool from SKF simulates the behavior of a...

 

Structural Adhesives for Wind Turbines

For certain applications, adhesives can work better than...

 

Near Term Power Prediction

While the variability of wind has become a challenge in the...

 

LOGISTICS

Have a PIP Method in place to plan, identify and process...

 

Growth Trends in Wind

A competitive analysis of conventional and renewable energy...

 

Deepwater Wind Developments

With the development of technologies such as Distributed...

 

Wind Turbine Obstruction Lighting

When International Tower Lighting, LLC considered the...

 

Q&A: Joe Brenner

Vice President of Production/Nordex USA

 

CONSTRUCTION

While preventing the need for an emergency response is the...

 

CONSTRUCTION

Ensuring worker safety is a critical aspect of a...

 

Are We Really Building the Best Wind Turbines?

A new turbine design uses old-fashioned know-how to reduce...

 

LOGISTICS

Component manufacturers will benefit by understanding how...

 

LOGISTICS

For logistics experts, years of experience in the field...

 

TECHNOLOGY

Optimizing passive tuned mass dampers can greatly reduce...

 

Harnessing Digital Elevation Data

Intermap Technologies explains how using terrain...

 

Wind Drive Train Ride-Through Performance

The permanent magnet synchronous generator, combined with a...

 

A Departure in Turbine Design

A new turbine design harvests more energy from lower wind...

 

Q&A: Bob Billger

Strategic Accounts Manager/Seco Tools, Inc.

 

TECHNOLOGY

As designs progress and new technologies emerge, the...

 

LOGISTICS

Variability is the “ghost in the machine” when it comes...

 

Manufacturing Profile: Lincoln Electric Co.

Now celebrating its 115th year, this company is known for...

 

LOGISTICS

Offshore energy production is on the rise around the world,...

 

LOGISTICS

Logistics experts must be able to take both a global and a...

 

CONSTRUCTION

Clarifying scope definition prior to beginning a project...

 

Company Profile: FARO Technologies, Inc.

Rooted in academia, and powered by the entrepreneurial...

 

Q&A: Bob Billger

Strategic Accounts Manager/Seco Tools, Inc.

 

TECHNOLOGY

How to perform proper inspection of wind turbine components...

 

LOGISTICS

Demurrage and detention fees are penalty charges that...

 

A Measured Change

The wind industry is moving toward ultrasonic anemometers...

 

Company Profile: FARO Technologies, Inc.

Rooted in academia, and powered by the entrepreneurial...

 

Archives > July 2012 > LOGISTICS

LOGISTICS

By: Michael Graska

 

Logistics planning becomes more difficult with uncertainty about the future of wind energy tax credits.

 

Unlike previous years, AWEA Windpower 2012 held in Atlanta, had less than stellar attendance. Unfortunately, the attendance downturn will very likely parallel the downturn in wind turbine installations next year. The reasons are well known and include the uncertainty of tax credits, tight credit and general global economic forces. Everyone I talked to at the show could not begin to predict wind’s immediate future in the United States. This got me thinking about how this will affect logistics in the near future.

Four major groups will have to deal with this downturn, each being affected differently. The principle groups are; OEM (original equipment manufacturers), Developers, General Contractors, and Transportation Companies.

OEMs are already cutting back on production resulting in layoffs and reduction of capacity. This is very apparent with second tier OEMs. So, even if all the underlying issues for the downturn are resolved, it will take quite a few months to ramp up and fill the pipeline with products. Because of this, OEMs may very well buy from unaffected foreign sources. One caveat however, to this foreign sourcing could be import tariffs imposed by the US. In any case, all this uncertainty adds complexity, which makes logistics planning all that more difficult.

OEM reaction to this uncertainly may go in a couple of directions. Cutbacks may affect their logistics departments, in which case they may have to rely more on third party logistics companies for planning and execution. On the other hand especially the tier 1 manufacturers, work that was normally delegated to outside sources may be pulled back because of excess capacity. This would be done to further gain control over costs and better manage execution.

For developers, logistics costs become an even larger cost consideration. With tight budgets, keeping logistics cost down becomes a major factor in choosing who controls this item. The decision a developer has to make is whether to assume logistics control or delegate it to either the OEM or general contractor. There are good arguments for all these approaches and it also depends on the proficiency of the developer to handle logistics. But an important consideration is as the OEM cuts into its logistics capacity and knowledge, just how well will they be able to preform in the future and how much is the developer willing to take this risk.

Execution of a logistics plan has always been a focus of the general contractor.  Having the right part at the right place at the right time is critical to their construction schedule. They are dependent on the capability of the logistic sources chosen by the OEM or developer. For the general contractor, they are at the end of a bullwhip, where as a slight movement at the handle in this case either the OEM or developer, results in a big movement for them.   Choices by the OEM or developer will be greatly amplified as felt by the general contactor.

Finally the changes for transportation companies will be large.  Excess asset capacity will be mothballed or sold.  Experienced personnel will migrate to other industries. An example of this would be heavy-haul drivers driving other equipment in other industries. Transportation companies will also shift resources to other industries for diversification. There will certainly be winners and losers within the industry. With a continuing trend of less companies capable of moving wind components. This will happen through attrition and consolidation.

But all of the above is not necessarily bad for the transportation industry. The surviving companies will be stronger, more innovative and competitive.  And this is good news for OEMs, developers and general contractors.

Although the show was less than well attended, I can attest to the strong belief in the wind industry by the participants and attendees.  All were pragmatic about the near future, but all were optimistic about the overall wind industry, especially if and when the overall issues are resolved. Everyone I spoke with is looking forward to the show next year in Chicago, if for no other reason than to see if it is a wake or a rebirth. I am betting on the latter. 

 

 

About The Author
Michael Graska

is senior manager of operations and engineering for Vectora Transportation LLC. For more information, email him at mgraska@vectoratransportation.com or visit www.vectoratransportation.com.

 

 

Wind Systems is a trademark of Media Solutions, Inc, copyright 2002-2010.

Wind Systems and all contents are properties of Media Solutions, Inc.