Wind Systems Magazine

April 20, 2014

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Maximizing Wind Energy Yield

Wind farm operators want to make sure their turbines are...

 

MAINTENANCE

Whether it’s a broken bolt found on the deck or a...

 

Predicting Gearbox Health

As is the case with any major capital investment,...

 

TECHNOLOGY

In addition to obvious siting factors such as location and...

 

Scaling the Heights Safely

Avanti Wind Systems is dedicated to designing and...

 

Remote Condition Management

Not only does the CMaS system from Moventas gather critical...

 

Advances in Remote Monitoring

The SKF WindCon turbine monitoring system provides...

 

Optimized Wind Farm Operation and Maintenance

The challenges of selecting an O&M service provider in a...

 

Increasing Generator Lifespan

Not only can upgrades drastically increase the service life...

 

Q&A: Dane Overfield

Product Development Lead, Exele Information Systems, Inc.

 

Wind is on the Rise

New coatings, foundation curing products and resins...

 

MAINTENANCE

More than just for crew photos, a digital camera can be a...

 

Q&A: Aaron Sage

Chief Operations Officer, Sage Oil Vac, Inc.

 

Monitoring Rotating Machinery

Keeping an eye on the health of your wind turbine rotating...

 

TECHNOLOGY

Industrial Ethernet is a key component as wind farm...

 

Managing Drivetrain Health: Knowledge is Power, Time is Money

Stretching your O&M budget can be achieved by properly and...

 

Inspecting Gears for Wind

The new 3000GM analytical gear inspection system from...

 

Company Profile: ACCIONA Windpower

With more than 15 years of experience in the global wind...

 

TECHNOLOGY

Wind turbine blades are growing larger, so research must be...

 

Twisting in the Warranty Winds

Understanding and managing wind turbine warranty exposure...

 

MAINTENANCE

Despite sophisticated control systems on modern wind...

 

MAINTENANCE

Reviewing the wind turbine theory of operation for better...

 

Cool System, Hot Results

New cooling system from Parker provides significant...

 

MAINTENANCE

The best way to avoid turbine downtime is to follow quality...

 

Q&A: Roger Simonson

Founder, CEO & President, One Eye Industries, Inc.

 

MAINTENANCE

Pre-end of warranty inspections assess the service history...

 

A Guide to Wind Turbine Alignment

The experts at Alignment Supplies know shaft alignment...

 

Real-Time Monitoring Solutions

Vibration Specialty Corporation’s Protect Wireless system...

 

Inspect and Maintain, Refurbish, or Re-blade?

A method for addressing blade damage that has been...

 

LOGISTICS

Association and member companies work on transporting...

 

MAINTENANCE

PTC or not, the wind industry is an ever-changing landscape...

 

MAINTENANCE

In this conclusion of a two-part series, the author...

 

Company Profile: Spectro, Inc.

Based in Massachusetts, Spectro, Inc. is a technology...

 

Company Profile: Gearbox Express

Gearbox Express is fulfilling a niche the wind power...

 

Company Profile: Broadwind Energy, Inc.

With expertise in manufacturing gears and towers—and...

 

Archives > August 2011 > Enhanced Turbine Performance Monitoring

Enhanced Turbine Performance Monitoring

By: Anoop Verma & Andrew Kusiak, Ph.D.

 

The authors of this article clearly demonstrate the benefits of applying data-mining techniques to the prediction of fault modes in wind turbines.

 

Components of wind turbines are affected by asymmetric loads, variable wind speeds, and severe weather conditions which cause wind turbines to change their states. A typical wind turbine undergoes various states during its daily operations. The wind turbine states follow a certain pattern, such as: 1) turbine OK to run-up idling; 2) turbine online to maintenance/repair mode; 3) turbine weather conditions to external stop, and; 4) turbine OK to fault mode, and so on. A state change from normal turbine operations to a fault mode adversely impacts the performance of wind turbines and its components. Monitoring these states can greatly augment the maintenance operations.

Wind turbine monitoring can be done in two ways: condition-based, and performance-based. Condition monitoring requires installation of additional equipment/sensors to continuously monitor relevant parameters in real time. Performance monitoring utilizes historical data for prediction of turbine performance. Since performance monitoring relies on the existing data, there is no additional cost to the wind farm operators. Analyzing the historical data through data-mining techniques is a promising approach to performance monitoring. The current SCADA systems already record wind turbine parameters. An improved SCADA system coupled with data-mining algorithms can be useful in identifying critical performance indicators of wind turbines. This article demonstrates application of data-mining techniques to prediction of fault modes of a wind turbine.

Turbine States Information
In addition to wind turbine parameters, a SCADA system records the states of wind turbines.  Consider 17 possible states in which a turbine can be found. The state “turbine in fault mode” (state No. 17 in Table 1) can usually be expressed in more than 400 ways. Components of a wind turbine such as wind turbine blades (e.g., blade angle asymmetry), turbine yaw (e.g., yaw runaway), wind turbine generator (e.g., generator brush worn), and wind turbine gearbox (e.g., gearbox over-temperature) can be affected. Using domain knowledge, the states listed in Table 1 can be broadly categorized into four main groups (Figure 1). At the top level, prediction of fault modes of wind turbine is crucial in identifying an actual fault.

Figure 2 displays the distribution of wind turbines states. The values are averaged for a wind farm over a year period. Almost 90 percent of the time the turbine is operating normally. However, faults make up 6.82 percent of the total time. Any effort to minimize the frequency of faults would enhance wind turbine availability.

Developing Prediction Models
In this section, data-mining models are developed for predicting turbine states. The data collect by the SCADA system is sampled at the frequency of 0.1 Hz. The faults that have occurred at 17 wind turbines in a three-month period are plotted in Figure 3. Based on the frequency of fault modes, three wind turbines are identified (labeled as A, B, and C in Figure 3). Data from turbine A is used for training and testing data-mining algorithms, whereas turbine B and C are used for performance evaluation.

Parameters for States Prediction
A SCADA system records various parameters, which can be categorized into: 1) non-controllable parameters such as wind speed and wind deviations; 2) performance parameters such as power output and rotor speed; 3) vibration parameters such as tower acceleration and drive train acceleration, and; 4) temperature parameters such as gearbox temperature and generator temperature. It is important to mention that not all the parameters are causing wind turbines to change its states. Therefore, we need to identify a set of parameters that impact the wind turbine states. This is the place where algorithms build using data-mining techniques are useful. Data-mining algorithms use statistical measure such as information gain and correlation coefficient to identify relevant set of parameters. Table 2 shows 10 parameters relevant to wind turbines states (data from turbine A), identified by three different data-mining algorithms. The techniques used are wrapper with genetic search (WGS), wrapper with best first search (WBFS), and boosting tree algorithms (BTA). For detailed description of these techniques refer to [1-3].

Data-Mining Models
A combination of relevant input parameters (found in previous section) can be used to develop prediction models for state faults. The evaluation of data-mining algorithms is based on the prediction accuracy of turbine states namely turbine OK (TO), weather downtime (WD), maintenance downtime (MD), and fault mode (FM) (Figure 4). The diagonal elements (e.g. TPTO, TPWD) are correctly predicted turbine states, whereas non-diagonal elements are wrongly predicted (e.g., FPFM, MD: turbine in fault mode is predicted as turbine in weather downtime).

Data-mining algorithms namely random forest algorithm (RFA) [4] is used to build eight prediction models at various time stamps, with the maximum prediction length of 5 min. The selection of data-mining algorithm is based upon their performance on training data at time stamp t. The accuracy was found to be in the range 81-99 percent for all turbine states (Table 3).

Robustness of Data-Mining Models
In order to check the robustness of developed models, various unseen faults were tested. The aim is to check the response of the model when unobserved faults are encountered. Figure 5A (a-b) Figure 5B displays the distribution states for turbines B and C plotted over a three-month period. The number of faults varies across turbines, however, turbines are found to be operational most of the time.  The results shown in Table 4 and Table 5 illustrate the response of data-mining algorithms on turbine A and B. Except of the gearbox-related faults, other fault modes of wind turbines are correctly identified.

Conclusion
The parameters recorded by SCADA systems can be useful for monitoring purposes. Using prediction models derived by data-mining algorithms the states of wind turbines can be predicted ahead of the time, which can be helpful in maintenance planning. The models built using data-mining algorithms can be integrated with current SCADA system to enhance performance monitoring of wind turbines. Acknowledgement: The research reported in the paper has been supported by funding from the Iowa Energy Center, Grant 07-01.  

References:
1) Kohavi, R. and John, G.H., 1997, “Wrappers for feature subset selection,” Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2), pp. 273-324.
2) Sbihi, A., 2007, “A best first search exact algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem,” Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 13, pp. 337-351.
3) Kudo, T. and Matsumoto, Y., 2004, “A Boosting Algorithm for Classification of Semi-Structured Text,” EMNLP.
4) Liwa, A. and Wiener, M., 2002, “Classification and regression by random forest,” R News, 2(3), pp. 18-22.

 

 

About The Authors
Andrew Kusiak, Ph.D.

is with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at The University of Iowa. Kusiak can be reached at andrew-kusiak@uiowa.edu. Also go online to www.mie.engineering.uiowa.edu.

 
Anoop Verma

is a doctoral student with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at The University of Iowa.  Also go online to www.mie.engineering.uiowa.edu.

 

 

Wind Systems is a trademark of Media Solutions, Inc, copyright 2002-2010.

Wind Systems and all contents are properties of Media Solutions, Inc.