Wind Systems Magazine

May 21, 2013

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Company Profile: Alltite, Inc.

Over the past eight years this company has earned its...

 

Company Profile: Wind Energy Services Co.

With a parent company known as a pioneer in manufacturing...

 

Optimizing Offshore Efficiency

Offshore wind presents opportunities for those with the...

 

Maintenance Profile: Eaton Corporation

From maintenance services, to turnkey substation...

 

Company Profile: NRG Systems, Inc.

You can’t just talk the talk, you’ve got to walk it as...

 

Yaw Control Optimization

Precise optical yaw control can yield noticeable power...

 

Lubricating Gears with Synthetic Oils

Long oil life, low wear, and less energy consumption help...

 

Streamlining Your Maintenance Program

Organized documentation can be the foundation of an...

 

Wind Turbine Capacity Frontier From SCADA

The wind industry is experiencing rapid growth across the...

 

Cool System, Hot Results

New cooling system from Parker provides significant...

 

Comprehensive Tool Management

A comprehensive tool management system includes...

 

Effective Lubrication Filtration

Clean lubricants are critical to allowing your gearbox to...

 

Best Practices for Turbine Manufacturers

The experts at Rockwell Automation have developed six...

 

Improving Performance and Reliability with Condition Monitoring

Improvements to power plant reliability and performance can...

 

Battling Exposure with Blade Coatings

Wind turbine blades are exposed to the sun’s rays,...

 

Q&A: Pete Fuller

Directing Partner, Torkworx LP

 

Surge Protection for Electrical Systems

Approximately 85 percent of all lightning strikes to wind...

 

MAINTENANCE

Reviewing the wind turbine theory of operation for better...

 

Maximizing Wind Energy Yield

Wind farm operators want to make sure their turbines are...

 

Wind Turbine Obstruction Lighting

When International Tower Lighting, LLC considered the...

 

Predictive Diagnostics for Increased Productivity

Predictive diagnostic software detects departures from...

 

Raising Generator Reliability

By implementing proper maintenance procedures you can...

 

BUSINESS

Recently patented innovations address technical problems...

 

Wind on the Waves

Will 2011 be the “Sputnik moment” for the North...

 

Remote-Controlled Tower Maintenance

Robotic climbing machines provide an alternative to...

 

MAINTENANCE

Reviewing the wind turbine theory of operation for better...

 

MAINTENANCE

PTC or not, the wind industry is an ever-changing landscape...

 

Scaling the Heights Safely

Avanti Wind Systems is dedicated to designing and...

 

Q&A: Steve Casey

General Manager, Moventas, Inc

 

MAINTENANCE

Annual analyses of frequent turbine faults that cause...

 

Creative Condition Monitoring

Condition monitoring systems that monitor key components of...

 

MAINTENANCE

Despite sophisticated control systems on modern wind...

 

MAINTENANCE

In this conclusion of a two-part series, the author...

 

Extending Gear Oil Performance

With the next-generation Optigear Synthetic X 320, Castrol...

 

Archives > August 2011 > Enhanced Turbine Performance Monitoring

Enhanced Turbine Performance Monitoring

By: Anoop Verma & Andrew Kusiak, Ph.D.

 

The authors of this article clearly demonstrate the benefits of applying data-mining techniques to the prediction of fault modes in wind turbines.

 

Components of wind turbines are affected by asymmetric loads, variable wind speeds, and severe weather conditions which cause wind turbines to change their states. A typical wind turbine undergoes various states during its daily operations. The wind turbine states follow a certain pattern, such as: 1) turbine OK to run-up idling; 2) turbine online to maintenance/repair mode; 3) turbine weather conditions to external stop, and; 4) turbine OK to fault mode, and so on. A state change from normal turbine operations to a fault mode adversely impacts the performance of wind turbines and its components. Monitoring these states can greatly augment the maintenance operations.

Wind turbine monitoring can be done in two ways: condition-based, and performance-based. Condition monitoring requires installation of additional equipment/sensors to continuously monitor relevant parameters in real time. Performance monitoring utilizes historical data for prediction of turbine performance. Since performance monitoring relies on the existing data, there is no additional cost to the wind farm operators. Analyzing the historical data through data-mining techniques is a promising approach to performance monitoring. The current SCADA systems already record wind turbine parameters. An improved SCADA system coupled with data-mining algorithms can be useful in identifying critical performance indicators of wind turbines. This article demonstrates application of data-mining techniques to prediction of fault modes of a wind turbine.

Turbine States Information
In addition to wind turbine parameters, a SCADA system records the states of wind turbines.  Consider 17 possible states in which a turbine can be found. The state “turbine in fault mode” (state No. 17 in Table 1) can usually be expressed in more than 400 ways. Components of a wind turbine such as wind turbine blades (e.g., blade angle asymmetry), turbine yaw (e.g., yaw runaway), wind turbine generator (e.g., generator brush worn), and wind turbine gearbox (e.g., gearbox over-temperature) can be affected. Using domain knowledge, the states listed in Table 1 can be broadly categorized into four main groups (Figure 1). At the top level, prediction of fault modes of wind turbine is crucial in identifying an actual fault.

Figure 2 displays the distribution of wind turbines states. The values are averaged for a wind farm over a year period. Almost 90 percent of the time the turbine is operating normally. However, faults make up 6.82 percent of the total time. Any effort to minimize the frequency of faults would enhance wind turbine availability.

Developing Prediction Models
In this section, data-mining models are developed for predicting turbine states. The data collect by the SCADA system is sampled at the frequency of 0.1 Hz. The faults that have occurred at 17 wind turbines in a three-month period are plotted in Figure 3. Based on the frequency of fault modes, three wind turbines are identified (labeled as A, B, and C in Figure 3). Data from turbine A is used for training and testing data-mining algorithms, whereas turbine B and C are used for performance evaluation.

Parameters for States Prediction
A SCADA system records various parameters, which can be categorized into: 1) non-controllable parameters such as wind speed and wind deviations; 2) performance parameters such as power output and rotor speed; 3) vibration parameters such as tower acceleration and drive train acceleration, and; 4) temperature parameters such as gearbox temperature and generator temperature. It is important to mention that not all the parameters are causing wind turbines to change its states. Therefore, we need to identify a set of parameters that impact the wind turbine states. This is the place where algorithms build using data-mining techniques are useful. Data-mining algorithms use statistical measure such as information gain and correlation coefficient to identify relevant set of parameters. Table 2 shows 10 parameters relevant to wind turbines states (data from turbine A), identified by three different data-mining algorithms. The techniques used are wrapper with genetic search (WGS), wrapper with best first search (WBFS), and boosting tree algorithms (BTA). For detailed description of these techniques refer to [1-3].

Data-Mining Models
A combination of relevant input parameters (found in previous section) can be used to develop prediction models for state faults. The evaluation of data-mining algorithms is based on the prediction accuracy of turbine states namely turbine OK (TO), weather downtime (WD), maintenance downtime (MD), and fault mode (FM) (Figure 4). The diagonal elements (e.g. TPTO, TPWD) are correctly predicted turbine states, whereas non-diagonal elements are wrongly predicted (e.g., FPFM, MD: turbine in fault mode is predicted as turbine in weather downtime).

Data-mining algorithms namely random forest algorithm (RFA) [4] is used to build eight prediction models at various time stamps, with the maximum prediction length of 5 min. The selection of data-mining algorithm is based upon their performance on training data at time stamp t. The accuracy was found to be in the range 81-99 percent for all turbine states (Table 3).

Robustness of Data-Mining Models
In order to check the robustness of developed models, various unseen faults were tested. The aim is to check the response of the model when unobserved faults are encountered. Figure 5A (a-b) Figure 5B displays the distribution states for turbines B and C plotted over a three-month period. The number of faults varies across turbines, however, turbines are found to be operational most of the time.  The results shown in Table 4 and Table 5 illustrate the response of data-mining algorithms on turbine A and B. Except of the gearbox-related faults, other fault modes of wind turbines are correctly identified.

Conclusion
The parameters recorded by SCADA systems can be useful for monitoring purposes. Using prediction models derived by data-mining algorithms the states of wind turbines can be predicted ahead of the time, which can be helpful in maintenance planning. The models built using data-mining algorithms can be integrated with current SCADA system to enhance performance monitoring of wind turbines. Acknowledgement: The research reported in the paper has been supported by funding from the Iowa Energy Center, Grant 07-01.  

References:
1) Kohavi, R. and John, G.H., 1997, “Wrappers for feature subset selection,” Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2), pp. 273-324.
2) Sbihi, A., 2007, “A best first search exact algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem,” Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 13, pp. 337-351.
3) Kudo, T. and Matsumoto, Y., 2004, “A Boosting Algorithm for Classification of Semi-Structured Text,” EMNLP.
4) Liwa, A. and Wiener, M., 2002, “Classification and regression by random forest,” R News, 2(3), pp. 18-22.

 

 

About The Authors
Andrew Kusiak, Ph.D.

is with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at The University of Iowa. Kusiak can be reached at andrew-kusiak@uiowa.edu. Also go online to www.mie.engineering.uiowa.edu.

 
Anoop Verma

is a doctoral student with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at The University of Iowa.  Also go online to www.mie.engineering.uiowa.edu.

 

 

Wind Systems is a trademark of Media Solutions, Inc, copyright 2002-2010.

Wind Systems and all contents are properties of Media Solutions, Inc.